Filetype
Microsoft Word - GLOW.docx pro as a minimal NP: towards a unified theory of pro-drop Pilar Barbosa (University of Minho, Portugal) In recent years, there has been a return to Perlmutter’s (l971) insight that the implicit subject in the Null Subject Languages (NSL) is a fully specified pronoun that is deleted in PF (cf. Holmberg 2005 and Roberts 2010). This view has been motivated by the observatio
GLOW 36 Generative Linguistics in the Old World 36 The 36th GLOW will take place at Lund University from 2nd to 6th April 2013 (Colloquium April 3–5, workshops April 2nd and 6th). Host SOL, Centre for Languages and Literature, Lund University supported by The Birgit Rausing Language Programme Venue SOL, Centre for Languages and Literature, Lund University Main Colloquium April 3–5, 2013 THEME: FRE
https://konferens.ht.lu.se/fileadmin/user_upload/sol/ovrigt/konferens_glow36/Call_for_papers_GLOW_36.pdf - 2026-01-10
GLOW 2013 Workshop III April 6 DIACHRONIC WORKINGS IN PHONOLOGICAL PATTERNS Organizers: Marc van Oostendorp (Leiden/Meertens Instituut), Tobias Scheer (Nice-Sophia Antipolis) Contact: scheer@unice.fr Invited speaker: Patrick Honeybone, University of Edinburgh Deadline for submission: November 15, 2012 Notification of acceptance: January 20, 2013 Submission of abstracts: https://www.easychair.org/c
https://konferens.ht.lu.se/fileadmin/user_upload/sol/ovrigt/konferens_glow36/GLOW_2013_Workshop_3.pdf - 2026-01-10
GLOW 2013 Workshop I April 2 BIOLINGUISTICS Organizer: Anna Maria di Sciullo (Université du Québec à Montréal) Contact: disciullo4@gmail.com Invited speakers: Robert Berwick, MIT Charles Yang, UPenn Deadline for submission: November 15, 2012 Notification of acceptance: January 20, 2013 Submission of abstracts: https://www.easychair.org/conferences/?conf=glow36 This workshop addresses fundamental q
https://konferens.ht.lu.se/fileadmin/user_upload/sol/ovrigt/konferens_glow36/GLOW_2013_Workshop_I.pdf - 2026-01-10
GLOW 36, Lund April 3, 2013 Abstract composite possessor case in Udmurt* Anke Assmann Svetlana Edygarova Doreen Georgianke.assmannuni-leipzig.de jedygaromappi.helsinki.fi georgiuni-leipzig.de Timo Klein Philipp Weissertimo.kleinuni-leipzig.de philipp.weisseruni-leipzig.de 1 Introduction Observation: In Udmurt (Uralic), the possessor bears genitive or ablative. The case values are in complementary
Repairing Final-Over-Final Constraint Violations: Evidence from Basque verb clusters∗ Ricardo Etxepare (CNRS) Bill Haddican (CUNY-Queens College) April 5, 2013 1 Introduction • Focus: The Final-over-Final Constraint (FOFC), a generalization originally by Holmberg (2000) about the interaction between dominance relations and {head, complement} ordering cross-linguistically (Hawkins, 1983, 1995; Holm
glow handout Beata Moskal (http://homepages.uconn.edu/~bam09006) Limits on Noun-suppletion Generative Linguistics in the Old World 36 Lund, Sweden, April 2013 1/16 Limits on Noun-suppletion* Beata Moskal, University of Connecticut (beata.moskal@uconn.edu) 1 Introduction Suppletion: a single lexical item is associated with two phonologically unrelated forms, the choice of form depending on the morp
https://konferens.ht.lu.se/fileadmin/user_upload/sol/ovrigt/konferens_glow36/Handouts_and_Presentations/Moskal.pdf - 2026-01-10
Deriving the Functional Hierarchy Gillian Ramchand and Peter Svenonius CASTL, University of Tromsø GLOW 36, Lund University April 4, 2013 1 Introduction 1.1 The problem (1) The Minimalist Program strives to go beyond “explanatory ade- quacy” (an explanation of how language can be learned) to develop a plausible account for how human linguistic ability could have evolved (Chomsky 2005 inter alia).
Glow 36, at Lund: Workshop on Diachronic Workings in Phonological Patterns 1 Palatalisation and the Role of Morphological Bases Across the Italian Lexicon Sam Steddy, MIT, steddy@mit.edu ABSTRACT: I propose that a palatalisation rule in Italian misapplies because of Base-to-Derivative correspondence effects. In previous work I showed that the rule misapplies in verbal morphology because verbs stan
https://konferens.ht.lu.se/fileadmin/user_upload/sol/ovrigt/konferens_glow36/Handouts_and_Presentations/Steddy.pdf - 2026-01-10
Anti-reconstruction, anti-agreement and the dynamics of A-movement Gary Thoms University of Edinburgh GLOW 36, Lund April 3-5, 2013 1. Introduction • Empirical focus of this paper: A-reconstruction, i.e. reconstruction in A-chains, typically for scope. (1) An Austrian is likely to win the race. a. there is an Austrian that is likely to win the race: ∃> likely b. it is likely that an Austrian will
https://konferens.ht.lu.se/fileadmin/user_upload/sol/ovrigt/konferens_glow36/Handouts_and_Presentations/Thoms.pdf - 2026-01-10
1 Visser’s Generalization and the c-command condition on Control Jacek Witkoś (wjacek@amu.edu.pl) & Sylwiusz Żychliński (sylwiusz@amu.edu.pl) 1. Introduction The major focus of this presentation is Visser’s Generalization (Visser 1973), an observation that holds of very similar terminal strings in (1a-b), where the passive transformation is compatible with an Object Control predicate (cf. 2b) but
https://konferens.ht.lu.se/fileadmin/user_upload/sol/ovrigt/konferens_glow36/Handouts_and_Presentations/Witkos.pdf - 2026-01-10
Dinka and the architecture of long-distance extraction∗ Coppe van Urk (cvanurk@mit.edu) Norvin Richards (norvin@mit.edu) Massachusetts Institute of Technology GLOW 36, Lund University In the Nilotic language Dinka Nyarweng, both C and v have the EPP property: one XP must sit in their specifier (1) and (2): (1) CP XP C’ C TP . . . (2) vP XP v’ v VP . . . In this talk, we show that this system provi
Version: 26 March 1 Colloquium Program: GLOW 36, Lund University Wednesday April 3 Venue: The main lecture hall 1 08:30-18:00 Registration open – Please register 09:00-09:15 Welcome and announcements 09:15-10:15 Eric Reuland and Anna Volkova (Utrecht) Reflexivity without reflexives 10:15-11:15 Anke Assmann, Doreen Georgi, Timo Klein and Philipp Weisser (Leipzig) Possessor case in Udmurt: A local r
https://konferens.ht.lu.se/fileadmin/user_upload/sol/ovrigt/konferens_glow36/Programfiler/Colloquium_Program.pdf - 2026-01-10
GLOW 36, 2013, Lund University, Sweden http://konferens.ht.lu.se/glow-36/glow-home/ Version: 26 March Wednesday April 3 Venue: The main lecture hall 1 08:30-18:00 Registration open – Please register 09:00-09:15 Welcome and announcements 09:15-10:15 Eric Reuland and Anna Volkova (Utrecht) Reflexivity without reflexives 10:15-11:15 Anke Assmann, Doreen Georgi, Timo Klein and Philipp Weisser (Leipzig
Version: 26 March GLOW 36 Workshop III – Diachronic Workings in Phonological Patterns (Saturday 6 April, 2013) Venue: H435 1 Workshop Program 09:00-12:00 Registration open – Please register 09:45–10:30 Daniel Silverman (sjsu) On the evolution of heterophony: lexical semantic pressures on phonological alternations 10:30–10:45 Coffee/Tea Break 10:45–11:30 Sam Steddy (MIT) Palatalisation Across the I
A neoparametric approach to variation and change in English modals Elizabeth Cowper & Daniel Currie Hall Theoretical background How can syntactic structures vary from one language to another, or from one stage to another in the history of a single language? The strongest version of the cartographic approach to syntax says, in effect, that they cannot: “if some language provides evidence for […] a
Bare quantifiers and the like: analyzing the internal structure of functional words Jacopo Garzonio (University of Venice) & Cecilia Poletto (University of Frankfurt) garzonio@unive.it poletto@em.uni-frankfurt.de 1. Wh-items are known to have a different distribution according to whether they are bare or they contain a lexical restrictor. To mention only some cases, Pesetsky (1987) already noted t
Licensing of dative case in four Nordic languages Peter Svenonius, CASTL, University of Tromsø 1 Introduction. Scandinavian languages provide a rich basis for microcomparison in the distri- bution of the dative case. I discuss four examples and base the empirical observations in a licensing theory of dative case, integrated in a larger theory of abstract case. 2. Descriptive generalizations. 2.1 I
Restricting language change through micro-comparative analysis Jan Don a , Paula Fenger a & Olaf Koeneman b (a = University of Amsterdam, b = Radboud University Nijmegen) 1. Introduction Although the variation pertaining to subject verb agreement in dialects of Dutch is quite bewildering (cf. SAND atlas, Barbiers et al 2005), four exceptionless generalizations on paradigm structure can be formulat
