Dominerar suveränitets eller beskyddardiskurs i rättfärdigandet av Amerikanska militära interventioner?
This thesis examines the language used in the argumentation for interventions. Language is a mighty tool in every day life but in politics it is the way to survive, which means that language is power. The thesis examines argumentation before the United States interventions in Vietnam 1960 and Afghanistan 2001 to se in which discourse they fit either protective or sovereignty. It finds that the int
