Search results

Filter

Filetype

Your search for "*" yielded 558525 hits

Cognitive Science

Cognitive Science – D e p a r t m e n t o f P h i l o s o p h y C o g n i t i v e S c i e n c e GENERAL SYLLABUS 7 December 2017 1 Reg. no U 2017/631 General Syllabus for Third Cycle Studies for the Degree of Doctor in Cognitive Science This syllabus was approved by the Board of the Joint Faculties of Humanities and Theology on 7 December 2017 through the board for research studies and is compleme

https://www.fil.lu.se/fileadmin/user_upload/fil/dokument/Utbildningsdokument/General_Syllabus_Cognitive_Science_2017.pdf - 2026-05-07

Practical Philosophy

Practical Philosophy – D e p a r t m e n t o f P h i l o s o p h y P r a c t i c a l P h i l o s o p h y GENERAL SYLLABUS 7 December 2017 1 Reg. no U 2017/632 General Syllabus for Third Cycle Studies for the Degree of Doctor in Practical Philosophy This syllabus was approved by the Board of the Joint Faculties of Humanities and Theology on 7 December 2017 through the board for research studies and

https://www.fil.lu.se/fileadmin/user_upload/fil/dokument/Utbildningsdokument/General_Syllabus_Practical_Philosophy_2017.pdf - 2026-05-07

Reasoning and Representing

Reasoning and Representing 1 Pufendorf Lectures 2025: Vocabularies of Reason Handout for Lecture I Reasoning and Representing Bob Brandom Full Disclosure: These lectures are shamelessly promoting some of the ideas developed in more detail in the book: Ulf Hlobil and Robert Brandom, Reasons for Logic, Logic for Reasons: Pragmatics, Semantics, and Conceptual Roles, [Routledge, 2024]. Gilbert Harman:

https://www.fil.lu.se/fileadmin/user_upload/pufendorf/Files/Handout_for_Lecture_1_Reasoning_and_Representing.pdf - 2026-05-07

Logic and the Structure of Reasons

Logic and the Structure of Reasons 1 Pufendorf Lectures 2025: Vocabularies of Reason Handout for Lecture II Logic and the Structure of Reasons Bob Brandom I. The Structure of Reason Relations What is the relation between material reason relations of implication and incompatibility and formal logical relations of consequence and inconsistency? The former includes implications such as Pittsburgh is

https://www.fil.lu.se/fileadmin/user_upload/pufendorf/Files/Handout_for_Lecture_2_Logic_and_the_Structure_of_Reasons.pdf - 2026-05-07